High End Retouching Services High End Photo Retouching exists to provide high end commercial level retouching suitable for print. We work online and internationally. We specialise in commercial, beauty, glamour, magazine & Notoriety, fashion and editorial using industry standard retouching techniques to retain and enhance texture and deliver flawless results. Retouching, photo retouching, art design, freelance photo artists, fashion artists, fashion design, fashion retouching.
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
Photoshop Technique: Extractions
Photoshop Technique: Extractions
Post-Production
In this video, I will show you three different methods of how to extract your subject from a background. I’ll explain when to pick one technique over the other. I’ll also extract from plain and busy backgrounds and show you how to extract objects with small details, such as hair.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=LljoQsOWhHw
Saturday, September 8, 2012
THEY Representation
Photographer & and Food Stylist Angie Martin
The latest work from Photographer & Retoucher Eydis Einarsdottir and Food Stylist Angie Martin.
Fashion magazines now airbrushing models to make them look ... fatter?
Fashion magazines now airbrushing models to make them look ... fatter?
Oh Kate Upton, what have you done?
While magazines have airbrushed pounds off models and celebs for years, to the consternation of many, the latest trend in the editorial and advertising world is digitally altering subjects to appear larger and curvier.
“I have to airbrush clients’ to make them appear bigger and more womanly before I submit photographs,” one leading talent manager told FOX411’s Pop Tarts column. “Skinny doesn’t sell.”
Pick up the latest edition of Vogue featuring Lady Gaga on the cover and notice how tall and curvaceous she appears with a cinched waist and prominent bust and hips, a noticeable difference from the behind-the-scenes photo shoot video which appears on the fashion magazine’s website.
The mag did not respond to a request for comment.
Yes bountiful busts and backsides are back, even if they don't come naturally.
“The bootylicious-ness of the Beyonce, the J-Lo, and the Kim Kardashian effect is contagious, and Hollywood runs things more than models nowadays. It is definitely not about make-me-look skinny, it is make me look sexy and curvy. And we’re also seeing a trend in cleavage,” explained top celebrity stylist, Phillip Bloch. “(Airbrushing) is happening in several other parts of the body too. They want toned arms, and fuller faces.”
Leading model manager and publicist Nadja Atwal is very familiar with the growing practice of body plumping prior to print
“These poor girls (models) have been forced to lose the very curves that the general public wants in order to find a woman attractive," she said. "So when you do a sexier shoot with a skinnier girl, you have got to basically add volume via retouching where there is no volume in reality.”
Called “reverse retouching,” this practice first came under scrutiny in 2010 when Jane Druker, the editor of Healthy magazine in England, admitted that the cover girl arrived at the shoot looking “really thin and unwell.” But rather than being sent home and another model hired, the publication instead chose to retouch the model to look larger, in keeping with the publication’s dedication to “healthy” faces and figures.
The art director for health and fitness-orientated magazine SELF also confessed that models are retouched to look bigger and healthier, essentially faking fitness. In addition, former Cosmopolitan editor Leah Hardy admitted that during her reign at the magazine, bulk was added to models during post-production, and even the editor of British Vogue, Alexandra Shulman, revealed that she often has had to ask photographers to specifically make models not look so skinny.
And magazines aren’t the only offenders. Movie marketers do it too. Itty bitty actress Keira Knightley dared speak out in disgust over the posters for her film “King Arthur” after it was obvious that her bust has been digitally enhanced in a pretty “big” way.
“Publications will do whatever they think will make something sell. If curvier models are in, models will be airbrushed to appear curvy,” noted body image expert Sarah Maria. “The fashion and entertainment industry is interested in what sells, plain and simple.”
However, is adding weight with the click of a button, as opposed to subtracting it, really a step in the right direction in terms of promoting healthy body image?
According to Jena la Flamme, founder of Pleasurable Weight Loss and a staunch champion of healthy body image, this form of digital dishonesty is just as detrimental as selectively slimming.
“The practice of airbrushing models, whether to make them look bigger and bustier or smaller and thinner, reflects poorly on the fashion industry. These techniques are all about creating an illusion and distorting reality,” she explained. “It sets a bad example for women watching these celebrities because now they are vulnerable to comparing themselves to highly manipulated photo art, not a real photo of a real person. Though the photos aren’t real, they have a real and tangible negative effect on women who, bombarded by these images, are led to feel they aren’t meeting up to the standards of beauty.”
One fashion industry insider said the airbrushing controversy was being overblown, and that women in magazines have fuller figures because photo editors are leaving their computer tools alone. “(Magazines) generally are not airbrushing as much. That is their natural figure,” the source said.
So real or digitized, skinny is out, and curvy is in.
“It is helpful they are airbrushing images to look healthier, but why not just use healthier women and save yourself the hassle? Society is ready for change,” said former model turned filmmaker Nicole Clark. “I’m sure actresses and models would love to start eating healthier and feel more energetic.”
Danielle Jones-Wesley contributed to this report.
While magazines have airbrushed pounds off models and celebs for years, to the consternation of many, the latest trend in the editorial and advertising world is digitally altering subjects to appear larger and curvier.
“I have to airbrush clients’ to make them appear bigger and more womanly before I submit photographs,” one leading talent manager told FOX411’s Pop Tarts column. “Skinny doesn’t sell.”
Pick up the latest edition of Vogue featuring Lady Gaga on the cover and notice how tall and curvaceous she appears with a cinched waist and prominent bust and hips, a noticeable difference from the behind-the-scenes photo shoot video which appears on the fashion magazine’s website.
The mag did not respond to a request for comment.
Yes bountiful busts and backsides are back, even if they don't come naturally.
“The bootylicious-ness of the Beyonce, the J-Lo, and the Kim Kardashian effect is contagious, and Hollywood runs things more than models nowadays. It is definitely not about make-me-look skinny, it is make me look sexy and curvy. And we’re also seeing a trend in cleavage,” explained top celebrity stylist, Phillip Bloch. “(Airbrushing) is happening in several other parts of the body too. They want toned arms, and fuller faces.”
Leading model manager and publicist Nadja Atwal is very familiar with the growing practice of body plumping prior to print
“These poor girls (models) have been forced to lose the very curves that the general public wants in order to find a woman attractive," she said. "So when you do a sexier shoot with a skinnier girl, you have got to basically add volume via retouching where there is no volume in reality.”
Called “reverse retouching,” this practice first came under scrutiny in 2010 when Jane Druker, the editor of Healthy magazine in England, admitted that the cover girl arrived at the shoot looking “really thin and unwell.” But rather than being sent home and another model hired, the publication instead chose to retouch the model to look larger, in keeping with the publication’s dedication to “healthy” faces and figures.
The art director for health and fitness-orientated magazine SELF also confessed that models are retouched to look bigger and healthier, essentially faking fitness. In addition, former Cosmopolitan editor Leah Hardy admitted that during her reign at the magazine, bulk was added to models during post-production, and even the editor of British Vogue, Alexandra Shulman, revealed that she often has had to ask photographers to specifically make models not look so skinny.
And magazines aren’t the only offenders. Movie marketers do it too. Itty bitty actress Keira Knightley dared speak out in disgust over the posters for her film “King Arthur” after it was obvious that her bust has been digitally enhanced in a pretty “big” way.
“Publications will do whatever they think will make something sell. If curvier models are in, models will be airbrushed to appear curvy,” noted body image expert Sarah Maria. “The fashion and entertainment industry is interested in what sells, plain and simple.”
However, is adding weight with the click of a button, as opposed to subtracting it, really a step in the right direction in terms of promoting healthy body image?
According to Jena la Flamme, founder of Pleasurable Weight Loss and a staunch champion of healthy body image, this form of digital dishonesty is just as detrimental as selectively slimming.
“The practice of airbrushing models, whether to make them look bigger and bustier or smaller and thinner, reflects poorly on the fashion industry. These techniques are all about creating an illusion and distorting reality,” she explained. “It sets a bad example for women watching these celebrities because now they are vulnerable to comparing themselves to highly manipulated photo art, not a real photo of a real person. Though the photos aren’t real, they have a real and tangible negative effect on women who, bombarded by these images, are led to feel they aren’t meeting up to the standards of beauty.”
One fashion industry insider said the airbrushing controversy was being overblown, and that women in magazines have fuller figures because photo editors are leaving their computer tools alone. “(Magazines) generally are not airbrushing as much. That is their natural figure,” the source said.
So real or digitized, skinny is out, and curvy is in.
“It is helpful they are airbrushing images to look healthier, but why not just use healthier women and save yourself the hassle? Society is ready for change,” said former model turned filmmaker Nicole Clark. “I’m sure actresses and models would love to start eating healthier and feel more energetic.”
Danielle Jones-Wesley contributed to this report.
Photo Restoration,Retouching,clipping path
Photo Restoration,Retouching,clipping path
We are from Lithuania doing Photoshop service to Professional Photographers, Labs,Web shops and Ad agencies.
~ Retouching for high-end beauty/fashion, advertising, editorial, headshots
~ Product/Catalog prep for print and web
~ Complex/Creative image manipulation and compositing
~ Old/Damaged photo restoration, image colorization
~ Technical tasks – CMYK separation, color correction, clipping paths, background stripping etc..
simply email us a sample file/s with instructions and we will provide a fast price quote.
Please check out some examples of our work at www.gj-retouching.com
~ Retouching for high-end beauty/fashion, advertising, editorial, headshots
~ Product/Catalog prep for print and web
~ Complex/Creative image manipulation and compositing
~ Old/Damaged photo restoration, image colorization
~ Technical tasks – CMYK separation, color correction, clipping paths, background stripping etc..
simply email us a sample file/s with instructions and we will provide a fast price quote.
Please check out some examples of our work at www.gj-retouching.com
Drawing and retouching with tablets
Drawing and retouching with tablets
Whether you are a creative photographer, graphic designer or illustrator, the Wacom Bamboo range of digital drawing tablets is a great asset to have when creating your images. The tablet plugs straight into your PC or Mac and allows you to paint, draw and digitally retouch your artwork with precision and sensitivity.
The pen that is provided with the tablet is as close to tactile drawing as you can get. It works seamlessly with Photoshop so you can work with digital brushes, cloning tools, and a variety of textured implements. The tablet not only allows you to create artwork from scratch but provides a welcome alternative to your track pad or mouse. You can navigate Photoshop and many other creative packages more efficiently and with greater creative possibilities.
Equally you can use it for day-to-day administrative purposes. For example, digital signatures, very useful when you want to sign a document without having to print, hand sign and scan your paperwork.
Bamboo offers a range of products from the Fun range all the way up to Bamboo Connect, which provides a larger tablet to increase flexibility and work space. Here is a link to their website.
Written by United Creativity
Photo source: Flickr. Some rights reserved by joelogon
Portrait Retouching – The Good, The Bad and the Truly Execrable
Portrait Retouching – The Good, The Bad and the Truly Execrable
This is not a screed against portrait retouching. Whether you
retouch portraits is entirely your business and to some extent, the
business of the model.
It is a screed against laziness while acknowledging truth in advertising.
Great retouching is an art. It takes a lot of time to be consistently good at the process and while the tools have become easier to use, technology, however good still is really only a type of brush for the artist. I am a decent retoucher on my best day, there are lots of people who have put in more time, built more skill and do a way better job. My frustration lies in the illusion perpetrated by an increasing number of software providers that their product will give you perfect portraits or make you an expert retoucher in minutes.
As Heinlein wrote a very long time ago, TANSTAFFL – there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. I admit that I have downloaded trials of some of these commercial packages and in every case, they are all very much like using a cannon to go after a rat. You will get the rat, but you will also leave at least one large smoking crater behind as well.
Take a close look at the images in the ads. To credit the vendors, the ads are accurate. Where real people have blemishes, pores, zits, bushy eyebrows, dry lips, yellow teeth, yellowed eye whites, facial hair, ear hair, nose hair and myriad other alleged sins of existence, the retouched photos have none of these things. Unfortunately they look like they’ve been retouched with driveway brush and bear little resemblance to the real person.
Every human is critical of how he or she looks in photographs to some extent and we all have some foible, however minuscule that we believe shouts from the rooftops, that we would prefer was never seen nor heard from ever again. A great retoucher can make the adjustments to manage these things without making the model look like a reject from Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museum.
Our cameras and lenses are very good, and as a Hasselblad shooter, I have had models cringe when they see the RAW proofs because the camera does actually capture everything. Proper lighting will always help, but dependency on retouching software should never be a given. In a series of tests with multiple iterations of these “perfect” retouchers, the tool acts like a #4 trowel, hurling corrections measured in gallons when subtlety is all that is needed.
It’s ok to remove minor flaws, it’s not ok to make your model look inhuman or not like him or herself, UNLESS that’s what you are being paid to do. If that’s the outcome these global retouchers will save you tons of time because they are cannons to the rat. However, if you want to produce really exceptional portraits of people while not morphing the model into a mannequin, invest in yourself and learn to retouch with grace and subtlety. There are numerous resources available, one example being Scott Kelby’s Light It, Shoot It, Retouch It book. It’s not the only choice but if you are looking, it’s an excellent place to build skills.
Support the Photo Video Guy by buying it here.
It is a screed against laziness while acknowledging truth in advertising.
Great retouching is an art. It takes a lot of time to be consistently good at the process and while the tools have become easier to use, technology, however good still is really only a type of brush for the artist. I am a decent retoucher on my best day, there are lots of people who have put in more time, built more skill and do a way better job. My frustration lies in the illusion perpetrated by an increasing number of software providers that their product will give you perfect portraits or make you an expert retoucher in minutes.
As Heinlein wrote a very long time ago, TANSTAFFL – there ain’t no such thing as a free lunch. I admit that I have downloaded trials of some of these commercial packages and in every case, they are all very much like using a cannon to go after a rat. You will get the rat, but you will also leave at least one large smoking crater behind as well.
Take a close look at the images in the ads. To credit the vendors, the ads are accurate. Where real people have blemishes, pores, zits, bushy eyebrows, dry lips, yellow teeth, yellowed eye whites, facial hair, ear hair, nose hair and myriad other alleged sins of existence, the retouched photos have none of these things. Unfortunately they look like they’ve been retouched with driveway brush and bear little resemblance to the real person.
Every human is critical of how he or she looks in photographs to some extent and we all have some foible, however minuscule that we believe shouts from the rooftops, that we would prefer was never seen nor heard from ever again. A great retoucher can make the adjustments to manage these things without making the model look like a reject from Madame Tussaud’s Wax Museum.
Our cameras and lenses are very good, and as a Hasselblad shooter, I have had models cringe when they see the RAW proofs because the camera does actually capture everything. Proper lighting will always help, but dependency on retouching software should never be a given. In a series of tests with multiple iterations of these “perfect” retouchers, the tool acts like a #4 trowel, hurling corrections measured in gallons when subtlety is all that is needed.
It’s ok to remove minor flaws, it’s not ok to make your model look inhuman or not like him or herself, UNLESS that’s what you are being paid to do. If that’s the outcome these global retouchers will save you tons of time because they are cannons to the rat. However, if you want to produce really exceptional portraits of people while not morphing the model into a mannequin, invest in yourself and learn to retouch with grace and subtlety. There are numerous resources available, one example being Scott Kelby’s Light It, Shoot It, Retouch It book. It’s not the only choice but if you are looking, it’s an excellent place to build skills.
Support the Photo Video Guy by buying it here.
25 Stunning Before and After Photo Retouching Portraits
25 Stunning Before and After Photo Retouching Portraits
These days Photo retouching is getting very popular as every one want to look pretty same like models and celebrities in photoshots. Models and celebrities always look stunning with their flawless skins and body features on magazine and album covers and All this is possible by photoshop, which not only can enhance poor photos but also can turn ordinary photo or a person into a glamouros and mindblowing. For your inspiration we have showcased 25 Stunning Before and After Photo Retouching Portraits, are the wonders of photoshop which can do to an average person to super model. The original photo is on left and enhanced version on right. Enjoy
Why 'Reverse Retouching' is Just as Damaging as Photoshopped Slimdowns
Why 'Reverse Retouching' is Just as Damaging as Photoshopped Slimdowns
Magazines begin to bulk up models' bodies
It's no secret that magazines, advertisers and photographers make a habit of retouching models' bodies--sometimes beyond recognition. Using Photoshop and a variety of transformative airbrushing tactics, women's waistlines and hips are slimmed down to impossible proportions, thighs and calves are restricted to the same width, and arms, well, let's just say that they can go missing altogether.
The unattainable ideals have left a sour taste in the mouths of women as young as 14 years old. Last month, fed up teen Julia Bluhm petitioned Seventeen magazine to begin incorporating images of "real girls" onto its pages. Editor-in-Chief Ann Shoket responded by creating the Body Peace Treaty, an 8-point pledge that promised to "never change girls’ body or face shapes" and insisted that the magazine would only feature "real girls and models who are healthy."
[Vogue Bans Underweight, Underage Models]
The move was no doubt a minor step towards the solution of a major problem, but now the everyday woman thumbing through the pages of a fashion magazine has an entirely different battle to fight--the battle of the bulge. A recent report revealed that the latest trend to take the editorial and advertising world by storm is altering models to appear larger and curvier than they truly are--a big leap from the digital disappearing acts consumers are so used to seeing.
Called "reverse retouching," the practice can result in the subject having bigger cleavage, "toned arms, and fuller faces," according to top celebrity stylist Phillip Bloch. While the process is certainly a unique approach to (arguably) "accepting" healthier body images, the fact that there are any alterations at all still has some women hot under the collar.
Japanese Company Turns Human Ladies into Plastic Models
Japanese Company Turns Human Ladies into Plastic Models
Bijyo Photo (美女フォト; "Beautiful Woman Photo"), which is run by Japanese tech company DC Archives, offers pro style retouching to portraits with quick turnaround. Some of the types of portraits listed are, for example, hair saloon pics, bridal pics, or even modeling photos. The service, however, is also available to people who want their personal portraits retouched. It's possible that the service could alter photos being used in Japanese matchmaking (お見合い; omiai); photos of prospective partners are used in the selection arranging the initial meeting.
Bijyo Photo's various services include clearing up skin, making eyes larger (or even adding an extra eyelid fold), making faces slimmer, fixing teeth, tucking in tummies, and more. Bijyo Photo can also apply digital make up and even alter the outfits in the photos (such as making skirts shorter).
Depending on the work you need done, prices vary, but simply Photoshop work starts at around ¥840 or US$11 for each specific alteration (full body fixes, however, start at ¥2,100 or $27).
If people want to Photoshop the crap out of themselves, that's fine. That's their choice! But all the examples on the Bijyo Photo site don't look natural. The uncorrected versions, however, look far better: there are laugh lines, frown lines, imperfections that not only make the portraits looks real, but the subject, too.
As video games get more and more realistic, it's fascinating to see how developers are now tackling the ability to put physical imperfections in game characters, right down to every last wrinkle and spot. Because game creators know that those imperfections are what make us human. The desire for digital perfection results in plasticity, not reality and certainly not humanity.
Photoshop-type programs are allowing people to give themselves anime eyes—or even ridiculous triangle faces. This blending of "real" and "digital" seems contemporary—just as our own lives are becoming increasingly digital, the records of our appearance are, too. What's real is no longer real, and it's impossible to believe what you see. Bijyo Photo points out on its website, first impressions matter in portraits. Retouching those first impressions, unfortunately, matters more.
Retouching the face of Christ
Retouching the face of Christ
Presumably you have heard of the Spanish woman who decided the picture of the face of Christ in her local church was a little damaged and so thought she would do a little re-touching.
It ended up like this:
The story is rich in metaphors. I'd hate to think what else this old lady might get up to in her parish.
I am sure the same or worst would happen if the parish priest got his paint brush out but I rather think he has a responsibility for preserving the face of Christ but if the image is lost or damaged or obscured by old ladies... what then?
It should have looked like this
:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)